Premium
Increased insulin resistance and risk of incident cerebrovascular events in patients with pre‐existing atherothrombotic disease
Author(s) -
Tanne D.,
Tenenbaum A.,
Boyko V.,
Benderly M.,
Fisman E. Z.,
Matas Z.,
Adler Y.,
Behar S.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
european journal of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.881
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1468-1331
pISSN - 1351-5101
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02694.x
Subject(s) - medicine , insulin resistance , hazard ratio , diabetes mellitus , stroke (engine) , myocardial infarction , homeostatic model assessment , quartile , angina , acute coronary syndrome , confounding , proportional hazards model , insulin , cardiology , endocrinology , confidence interval , mechanical engineering , engineering
Background and purpose: Diabetes and the metabolic syndrome are known risk factors for ischaemic stroke. Our aim was to examine whether amongst patients with pre‐existing atherothrombotic disease, increased insulin resistance is associated with incident cerebrovascular events. Methods: Patients with stable coronary heart disease included in a secondary prevention trial were followed up for a mean of 6.2 years. Coronary heart disease was documented by a history of myocardial infarction ≥6 months and <5 years before enrollment and/or stable angina pectoris with evidence of ischaemia confirmed by ancillary diagnostic testing. Main exclusion criteria were insulin treated diabetes, hepatic or renal failure, and disabling stroke. Baseline insulin levels were measured in 2938 patients from stored frozen plasma samples and increased insulin resistance assessed using the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR), categorized into tertiles or quartiles. Results: Crude rates of incident cerebrovascular events rose from 5.0% for HOMA‐IR at the bottom tertile to 5.7% at the middle tertile, and 7.0% at the top tertile ( P = 0.07). HOMA‐IR at the top versus bottom tertile was associated with an unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.37 (95%CI, 0.94–1.98) and a 1‐unit increase in the ln HOMA‐IR was associated with a HR of 1.14 (95%CI, 0.97–1.35). In further analyses adjusting for potential confounders, or categorizing baseline HOMA‐IR into quartiles, or excluding diabetic patients, we did not identify an increased risk for incident cerebrovascular events conferred by the top category. Conclusions: Increased insulin resistance did not predict incident cerebrovascular events amongst patients with pre‐existing atherothrombotic disease.