Premium
Patient preference for eletriptan 80 mg versus subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg: results of a crossover study in patients who have recently used subcutaneous sumatriptan
Author(s) -
Schoenen J.,
Pascual J.,
Rasmussen S.,
Sun W.,
Sikes C.,
Hettiarachchi J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
european journal of neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.881
H-Index - 124
eISSN - 1468-1331
pISSN - 1351-5101
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00893.x
Subject(s) - sumatriptan , medicine , migraine , crossover study , anesthesia , alternative medicine , agonist , placebo , receptor , pathology
This current randomized, open‐label, crossover study evaluated preference for oral eletriptan 80 mg compared with subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg (suma‐sc) amongst patients ( n = 311) meeting IHS criteria for migraine who had recently used suma‐sc, and found it well tolerated. Three attacks were treated on each study medication. Assessment of subjective preference was evaluated, after which patients freely chose which study medication they wished to use to treat each of three additional migraine attacks. A slight majority (50.6%) preferred or greatly preferred eletriptan, whilst 43% preferred suma‐sc. When permitted to choose between eletriptan and suma‐sc for subsequent treatment, 78% of patients who had preferred eletriptan took eletriptan during the extension phase for all three of their attacks, whilst only 37% of patients who preferred suma‐sc took suma‐sc for all of their extension‐phase attacks ( P < 0.05). Secondary efficacy measures showed comparable efficacy for each study medication, except for faster headache response and pain‐free rates favor of suma‐sc, and a significantly lower recurrence rate on eletriptan (25% vs. 40%; P < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that eletriptan is a strong alternative option for patients who have been prescribed suma‐sc.