Premium
Pressure, Legitimacy, and Innovative Behavior by Public Organizations
Author(s) -
VERHOEST KOEN,
VERSCHUERE BRAM,
BOUCKAERT GEERT
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.46
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1468-0491
pISSN - 0952-1895
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00367.x
Subject(s) - flemish , legitimacy , new public management , autonomy , public administration , government (linguistics) , competition (biology) , public relations , politics , public service , adaptation (eye) , business , political science , public sector , psychology , law , ecology , linguistics , philosophy , archaeology , neuroscience , biology , history
According to New Public Management (NPM) doctrines, public organizations involved in service delivery and policy implementation will be induced to innovative behavior if they have enough managerial autonomy and simultaneously are subjected to managerial pressure, such as result control by government or competition of other providers. This NPM pressure‐response model is tested by using survey data on 84 Flemish public organizations. These tests provide evidence for the assumed effect of NPM‐like pressure on the innovative behavior of public organizations. However, the empirical model shows more complex relationships as is assumed by NPM doctrine. These complex relationships are corroborated and explained by making reference to a multiple‐case study of four Flemish public organizations. An expanded political/administrative pressure‐response model, referring to legitimacy as a motivational force, is suggested in order to explain innovative behavior by public organizations. This model may help to understand the preconditions for spontaneous adaptation of public organizations.