z-logo
Premium
Administrative Accountability in the ‘Westminster’ Democracies: Towards a New Conceptual Framework
Author(s) -
STONE BRUCE
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.46
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1468-0491
pISSN - 0952-1895
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0491.1995.tb00225.x
Subject(s) - accountability , public administration , political science , identification (biology) , conceptual framework , sociology , law , social science , botany , biology
Understandings of administrative accountability in the “Westminster” democracies remain too closely linked to the institutional arrangements through which accountability has traditionally been exacted in these countries. This has prevented a full appreciation of the nature and extent of changes which have been under way for some time. The article argues that a refined concept of accountability and five subordinate “conceptions” of accountability, corresponding to distinctive sets of institutional arrangements, are needed to comprehend the relevant changes. The identification of multiple options for administrative accountability, in turn, raises questions about how the different accountability systems are to be chosen and combined to maximize accountability without impairing administrative effectiveness.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here