Premium
The National Judiciary—Sword of European Court of Justice Rulings: The Example of the Kohll/Decker Jurisprudence
Author(s) -
Obermaier Andreas J.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
european law journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.351
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1468-0386
pISSN - 1351-5993
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00439.x
Subject(s) - jurisprudence , legislator , law , legislation , european court of justice , political science , sword , economic justice , preliminary ruling , european union law , european union , economics , computer science , economic policy , operating system
The role of the national judiciary in enforcing EC law, and particularly European Court of Justice (ECJ) rulings, has been largely neglected by empirical legal and political science research. Existing research has categorised the role of the national judiciary as either shielding national legislation from the ECJ or as serving as a ‘sword’ to foster integration and to force change on reluctant governments. This article sides with the second assumption and attempts to empirically assess it using the example of the patient mobility jurisprudence by the ECJ, the so‐called Kohll/Decker jurisprudence. The three case studies on France, the UK and Germany show that national courts played an important role in overcoming the resistance against this jurisprudence: via a multiplication of national court cases that contradicted domestic legislation they forced the legislator to end judicial uncertainty.