z-logo
Premium
INTENTIONAL ACTION AND THE UNINTENTIONAL FALLACY
Author(s) -
WASSERMAN RYAN
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
pacific philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1468-0114
pISSN - 0279-0750
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2011.01410.x
Subject(s) - fallacy , commit , action (physics) , epistemology , simple (philosophy) , set (abstract data type) , moral responsibility , philosophy , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , database , programming language
Much of the recent work in action theory can be organized around a set of objections facing the Simple View and other intention‐based accounts of intentional action. In this paper, I review three of the most popular objections to the Simple View and argue that all three objections commit a common fallacy. I then draw some more general conclusions about the relationship between intentional action and moral responsibility.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here