z-logo
Premium
THE VAGUENESS ARGUMENT FOR MEREOLOGICAL UNIVERSALISM*
Author(s) -
SMITH DONALD
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pacific philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1468-0114
pISSN - 0279-0750
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00266.x
Subject(s) - vagueness , premise , argument (complex analysis) , mereology , universalism , epistemology , philosophy , political science , law , linguistics , biochemistry , chemistry , politics , fuzzy logic
  In this paper, I critically discuss one of the more influential arguments for mereological universalism, what I will call ‘the Vagueness Argument’. I argue that a premise of the Vagueness Argument is not well supported and that there are at least two good reasons for thinking that the premise in question is false.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here