Premium
ROSS ON DESERT AND PUNISHMENT
Author(s) -
MORIARTY JEFFREY
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
pacific philosophical quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1468-0114
pISSN - 0279-0750
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00257.x
Subject(s) - desert (philosophy) , argument (complex analysis) , denial , punishment (psychology) , scope (computer science) , state (computer science) , epistemology , philosophy , law and economics , sociology , law , political science , psychoanalysis , social psychology , psychology , computer science , chemistry , biochemistry , algorithm , programming language
W. D. Ross thinks it is good, other things equal, that people get what they deserve. But he denies that “the principle of punishing the vicious, for the sake of doing so, is that on which the state should proceed in its bestowal of punishments.” Ross offers two main arguments for this denial: what I call the “scope argument” and the “state's purpose argument.” I argue that both fail. In doing so, I illuminate Ross's distinctive views about desert and the state.