z-logo
Premium
Sound and Fury: Pretextual Prosecution and Department of Justice Antiterrorism Efforts
Author(s) -
LOCHNER TODD
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9930
pISSN - 0265-8240
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00273.x
Subject(s) - law enforcement , law , political science , economic justice , criminal justice , criminology , sociology
Using Justice Department antiterrorism efforts as a case study, this article expands upon existing theories of pretextual prosecution by distinguishing a law enforcement system that employs a pretextual strategy from one that employs what I term technical or disingenuous prosecutions. Contrary to Justice Department claims, the data suggest that since September 2001, federal investigators continually have referred a large number of specious antiterrorism matters to federal prosecutors. The data further suggest that federal prosecutors are more likely to be engaging in technical or disingenuous prosecutions than pretextual prosecutions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here