Premium
Contextualizing the Different Voice: Women, Occupational Goals, and Legal Education *
Author(s) -
GRANFIELD ROBERT
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9930
pISSN - 0265-8240
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1994.tb00114.x
Subject(s) - criticism , essentialism , race (biology) , significant difference , empirical research , class (philosophy) , psychology , social psychology , sociology , gender studies , political science , law , epistemology , medicine , philosophy
Essentialist views reporting the existence of distinct gender differences have received much criticism. Despite these critiques, there is little empirical research on the limitations of these approaches in institutions such as law schools. While studies of legal education have been informed by gender difference theory, few have sought to contextualize difference. This study examines gender difference among students attending Harvard Law School. Using survey and interview data, this study demonstrates that difference is mediated by such variables as occupational goals, social class, and race. Implications of differences among women are discussed as they relate to reforms in legal education.