Premium
JUDGING WITHOUT CONSENSUS: The Diplock Courts in Northern Ireland
Author(s) -
CARLTON CHARLES
Publication year - 1981
Publication title -
law and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.534
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1467-9930
pISSN - 0265-8240
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1981.tb00244.x
Subject(s) - jury , commission , politics , relevance (law) , political science , law , work (physics) , economic justice , terrorism , northern ireland , sociology , engineering , mechanical engineering , ethnology
This article examines nonjury trials for political/terrorist offenses in Northern Ireland. It traces the origins of the current troubles; the breakdown of the jury system; the work of the royal commission, chaired by Lord Justice Diplock; and the establishment of courts, known as Diplock Courts, in which a single judge tries cases using modified rules of evidence and lowered standards for the admission of confessions. Finally, the article evaluates the work of the Diplock Courts, and suggests their wider relevance to future policy‐making. In doing so, it touches upon a fundamental role of governing through courts—the maintenance of the ability to govern, particularly in a society that has neither political nor judicial consensus.