z-logo
Premium
The restricted likelihood ratio test for autoregressive processes
Author(s) -
Chen Willa W.,
Deo Rohit S.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of time series analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.576
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1467-9892
pISSN - 0143-9782
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00769.x
Subject(s) - mathematics , autoregressive model , unit root , likelihood ratio test , statistics , bounded function , unit interval , confidence interval , hypercube , unit root test , square root , series (stratigraphy) , combinatorics , mathematical analysis , cointegration , paleontology , geometry , biology
The restricted likelihood is known to produce estimates with significantly less bias in AR( p ) models with intercept and/or trend. In AR(1) models, the corresponding restricted likelihood ratio test (RLRT), unlike the t ‐statistic or the usual LRT, has been recently shown to be well approximated by the chi‐square distribution even close to the unit root, thus yielding confidence intervals with good coverage properties. In this article, we extend this result to AR( p ) processes of arbitrary order p by obtaining the expansion of the RLRT distribution around that of the limiting chi‐squared and showing that the error is bounded even as the unit root is approached. Next, we investigate the correspondence between the AR coefficients and the partial autocorrelations, which is well known in the stationary region, and extend to the more general situation of potentially multiple unit roots. In the case of one positive unit root, which is of most practical interest, the resulting parameter space is shown to be the bounded p ‐dimensional hypercube (−1, 1] × (−1, 1) p −1 . This simple parameter space, in addition with a stable algorithm that we provide for computing the restricted likelihood, allows its easy computation and optimization as well as construction of confidence intervals for the sum of the AR coefficients. In simulations, the RLRT intervals are shown to have not only near exact coverage in keeping with our theoretical results, but also shorter lengths and significantly higher power against stationary alternatives than other competing interval procedures. An application to the well‐known Nelson–Plosser data yields RLRT based intervals that can be markedly different from those in the literature.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here