Premium
SELF‐ABANDONMENT AND SELF‐DENIAL
Quietism, Calvinism, and the Prospect of Hell
Author(s) -
Munzer Stephen R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of religious ethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.306
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1467-9795
pISSN - 0384-9694
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2005.00246.x
Subject(s) - abandonment (legal) , calvinism , predestination , damnation , philosophy , faith , denial , piety , protestantism , theology , eternity , self , psychoanalysis , law , psychology , political science
Self‐abandonment and self‐denial are, respectively, Catholic and hyper‐Calvinist analogues of each other. Roughly, each requires the surrendering of a person to God's will and providence through faith, hope, and love. Should the self‐abandoning/self‐denying individual accept his or her own damnation if that be God's will? This article, which is virtually alone in discussing the Catholic and Reformed Protestant traditions together, answers “No.” The unqualified self‐abandonment present in quietism and the radical self‐denial of Samuel Hopkins are perverse and irrational responses to the prospect of hell because they run counter to the Christian's deepest need to spend eternity with God. However, a qualified self‐abandonment is intellectually defensible and offers a viable Christian piety.