z-logo
Premium
Signaling in Political Budget Cycles: How Far Are You Willing to Go?
Author(s) -
STREB JORGE MIGUEL
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of public economic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.809
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1467-9779
pISSN - 1097-3923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2005.00202.x
Subject(s) - opportunism , politics , economics , key (lock) , market economy , political science , computer science , law , computer security
A key assumption in the literature on political cycles with rational voters and opportunistic politicians is that opportunism is common knowledge. In this framework, political cycles have been interpreted as a signal of competency. However, if opportunism is not common knowledge, cycles may no longer indicate competency, but rather opportunism. This is because highly opportunistic incumbents are willing to go farther to be reelected. Since political cycles require discretionality to reallocate budget items, a decrease of discretionality curbs cycles. It may also make elections more effective at selecting competent incumbents.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here