Premium
THREE THEORIES OF HUMAN NATURE
Author(s) -
Stenmark Mikael
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
zygon®
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.222
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1467-9744
pISSN - 0591-2385
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9744.2009.01040.x
Subject(s) - darwinism , blank , social darwinism , denial , epistemology , constructive , sociology , social theory , philosophy , psychology , psychoanalysis , law , political science , computer science , engineering , operating system , mechanical engineering , process (computing) , politics
. In The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature , Steven Pinker maintains that at present there are three competing views of human nature—a Christian theory, a “blank slate” theory (what I call a social constructivist theory), and a Darwinian theory—and that the last of these will triumph in the end. I argue that neither the outcome of such competition nor the particular content of these theories is as clear as Pinker believes. In this essay I take a critical as well as a constructive look at the challenge presented by a Darwinian theory of human nature—a challenge to the social sciences and the humanities and also to theology and more specifically to a Christian understanding of human nature.