Premium
Between Subject Enclitic and Agreement Marker: The Second Person Endings in Sicilian
Author(s) -
Cruschina Silvio,
Rinollo Melanie
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
transactions of the philological society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.333
H-Index - 26
eISSN - 1467-968X
pISSN - 0079-1636
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-968x.2012.01317.x
Subject(s) - subject (documents) , linguistics , verb , grammaticalization , clitic , subject pronoun , affix , pronoun , agreement , demonstrative , morpheme , realization (probability) , history , head (geology) , feature (linguistics) , psychology , computer science , mathematics , philosophy , statistics , library science , geomorphology , geology
In this paper we analyse the characteristics of 2sg verb‐final ‐ tu in Sicilian. Although this is generally referred to as an enclitic subject pronoun, it is clear that it is different from the subject clitics found in northern Italian dialects. The question of whether it is an actual subject enclitic or rather an inflectional affix remains controversial. The primary empirical goal of this study is to provide a general characterization of the synchronic properties of this element, focusing firstly on its grammatical status, and secondly on the distributional differences with respect to the 2pl ending ‐ vu . This comparison will lead us to the conclusion that ‐ tu and ‐ vu instantiate a path of grammaticalization, and that their origins are to be sought in the morphosyntactic reflexes of the feature ‘hearer’. More specifically, we claim that the original subject pronoun was at some stage the phonological realization of the head of the functional projection HearerP, but has been subsequently reanalysed as a bound morpheme encoding agreement. This diachronic account straightforwardly explains the flows and problems with the historical analysis that assumes disambiguation in the verbal paradigm to be the triggering factor.