z-logo
Premium
Comparative Sacred Texts and Interactive Interpretation: Another Alternative to the “World Religions” Class
Author(s) -
Patton Laurie L.,
Robbins Ver K.,
Newby Gordon D.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
teaching theology and religion
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.165
H-Index - 11
eISSN - 1467-9647
pISSN - 1368-4868
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9647.2008.00479.x
Subject(s) - interpretation (philosophy) , opposition (politics) , epistemology , ethnography , argument (complex analysis) , reading (process) , sociology , pluralism (philosophy) , religious pluralism , class (philosophy) , linguistics , philosophy , anthropology , political science , religious studies , law , biochemistry , chemistry , politics
In this article we argue for an introductory course in the study of religion that proceeds through interactive interpretation as a responsible form of comparison. Interactive interpretation proceeds provisionally, and encourages students to formulate new questions of the materials instead of making final categories about the materials. We use examples from a typical classroom to show how we work with three pedagogical principles: (1) critical reading; (2) pluralism within religious traditions as well as between religious traditions; and (3) the use of the working hypothesis as a tool in analyzing religious texts. We also make an argument for textual reading as a form of living intellectual practice, which can work alongside of, and not in opposition to, other approaches to the study of religion, such as ethnographic or historical approaches.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here