Premium
Professional non‐neutrality: criticising the third party in psychotherapy
Author(s) -
Voutilainen Liisa,
Peräkylä Anssi,
Ruusuvuori Johanna
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
sociology of health and illness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1467-9566
pISSN - 0141-9889
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01245.x
Subject(s) - neutrality , context (archaeology) , psychotherapist , dysfunctional family , psychology , action (physics) , institution , social psychology , sociology , law , political science , social science , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , biology
Using audio‐recorded data from cognitive‐constructivist psychotherapy, the article shows a particular institutional context in which successful professional action does not adhere to the pattern of affective neutrality which Parsons saw as an inherent component of medicine and psychotherapy. In our data, the professional’s non‐neutrality functions as a tool for achieving institutional goals. The analysis focuses on the psychotherapist’s actions that convey a critical stance towards a third party with whom the patient has experienced problems. The data analysis revealed two practices of this kind of critique: (1) the therapist can confirm the critique that the patient has expressed or (2) return to the critique from which the patient has focused away. These actions are shown to build grounds for the therapist’s further actions that challenge the patient’s dysfunctional beliefs. The article suggests that in the case of psychotherapy, actions that as such might be seen as apparent lapses from the neutral professional role can in their specific context perform the task of the institution at hand.