z-logo
Premium
Practising Open Disclosure: clinical incident communication and systems improvement
Author(s) -
Iedema Rick,
Jorm Christine,
Wakefield John,
Ryan Cherie,
Dunn Stewart
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
sociology of health and illness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.146
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1467-9566
pISSN - 0141-9889
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01131.x
Subject(s) - reflexivity , public relations , health care , nursing , health professionals , best practice , affect (linguistics) , psychology , business , sociology , medicine , political science , law , social science , communication
This article explores the way that professionals are being inducted into articulating apologies to consumers of their services, in this case clinicians apologising to patients. The article focuses on the policy of Open Disclosure that is being adopted by health care organisations in the US, Canada, the UK and Australia and other nations. Open Disclosure policy mandates ‘open discussion of clinical incidents’ with patient victims. In Australia, Open Disclosure policy implementation is currently being complemented by intensive staff training, involving simulation of apology scenarios with actor‐patients. The article presents an analysis of data collected from such training sessions. The analysis shows how simulated apologising engages frontline staff in evaluating the efficacy of their disclosures, and how staff may thereby be inducted into reconciling their affective and reflexive sensibilities with their organisational and professional responsibilities, and thereby produce the required organisational apology. The article concludes that Open Disclosure, besides potentially relaxing tensions between clinicians and consumers, may also affect how staff experience and enact their role in the overall system of health care organisation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here