Premium
Is LEADER Elitist or Inclusive? Composition of Danish LAG Boards in the 2007–2013 Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes
Author(s) -
Thuesen Annette Aagaard
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
sociologia ruralis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.005
H-Index - 84
eISSN - 1467-9523
pISSN - 0038-0199
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00500.x
Subject(s) - danish , autonomy , composition (language) , perspective (graphical) , action (physics) , representation (politics) , democracy , political science , sociology , public relations , law , computer science , philosophy , linguistics , physics , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , politics
The literature on local action groups offers various reflections on whether the LEADER initiative is elitist or inclusive. As one of seven key concepts behind the LEADER method, the bottom‐up concept spurs an expectation that LEADER is more able to involve the average citizen than other programmes. Until now, however, only scarce information on the composition of the LEADER boards has been available to tell us if this is really so at the decision‐making level. A survey from 2008 examining the composition of the 55 local action groups established in the 2007–2013 Danish Rural Development and Fisheries Programmes shows that most of the board members are extremely well‐educated older men who hold many other posts in society. This lopsided representation is discussed for its problems and potentials from two opposing theoretical angles: from a perspective of post‐liberal theories of inclusive democracy and the relative autonomy of elites and sub‐elites.