Premium
Institutions, the governance of quality and on‐farm value retention for Indonesian specialty coffee
Author(s) -
Neilson Jeff
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
singapore journal of tropical geography
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.538
H-Index - 42
eISSN - 1467-9493
pISSN - 0129-7619
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9493.2007.00290.x
Subject(s) - subsistence agriculture , commodity , commodity chain , quality (philosophy) , livelihood , corporate governance , agriculture , business , production (economics) , value (mathematics) , product (mathematics) , economics , agricultural economics , market economy , geography , finance , philosophy , geometry , mathematics , archaeology , epistemology , machine learning , computer science , macroeconomics
Fluctuating global commodity prices affect the livelihoods of millions of tropical farmers worldwide. In recent years, systemic oversupply of many tropical agricultural products, grown in countries such as Indonesia, has meant that agricultural incomes have continuously fallen below subsistence levels. Within an increasingly open global trade regime, along with the limited ability of governments to protect domestic farm prices, quality‐informed product differentiation appears to offer an escape route from the trap of low commodity prices. However, ownership and governance of quality constructions are fundamental to determining who benefits from such differentiation. This paper examines the use of geographical identities as a specific tool for value‐adding in agricultural produce, presenting the case of specialty coffee production in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. The potential for producer‐driven geographical indications compete with corporate‐driven quality constructions, where the latter are able to appropriate place‐related quality associations by using trademarks, vertical integration and tightly coordinated supply chain controls. An emergent politic of quality governance and ownership in global commodity chains reveals the highly restricted institutional terrain within which growers of specialty coffee might attempt to retain a higher share of the economic rent associated with quality production.