z-logo
Premium
From Qualified Majority to Simple Majority: The Effects of the 1992 Change in the Finnish Constitution
Author(s) -
Mattila Mikko
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
scandinavian political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-9477
pISSN - 0080-6757
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1997.tb00198.x
Subject(s) - parliament , opposition (politics) , voting , constitution , political science , legislation , government (linguistics) , law , majority rule , straight ticket voting , public administration , law and economics , political economy , group voting ticket , economics , politics , philosophy , linguistics
This paper analyzes the consequences of the 1992 change in the voting rule in the Finnish Parliament. Before this reform, one third of all Parliament members could delay a law proposal for reconsideration by the Parliament. This rule was abolished in 1992 which meant that the Finnish Parliament finally adopted a simple majority rule to decide on new legislation. The empirical part of this article analyzes the effects of the reform on the parliamentary parties voting power. The voting power of the big parties increased compared to that of the small parties. However, the variation among smaller parties was greater. The biggest losers were medium size parties. Considering the government and the parliament as institutions, the emphasis clearly moved to the government. Considering parties in the government coalitions as a whole (adding up their share in the government and in the Parliament), the picture was quite clear. The opposition lost at least some of its voting power. This change was clearest in the case of the party government model in which the opposition lost its voting power completely.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here