Premium
‘Ideal Types' of Referendum Behaviour
Author(s) -
Nilson Sten Sparre,
Bjørklund Tor
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
scandinavian political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-9477
pISSN - 0080-6757
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1986.tb00348.x
Subject(s) - referendum , ideal (ethics) , voting , argument (complex analysis) , politics , political science , voting behavior , positive economics , political economy , sociology , law , economics , medicine
Referendums represent a special variant of political elections. Although it must be assumed that the behaviour of voting in referendums is determined by a range of factors identical to those that are operative in other contests, it can be asked to what extent referendum voting behaviour is sensitive to active campaigning on the part of political parties and organized groups. It may add to our understanding of referendums, therefore, to analyze them in terms of three ‘ideal types’: party‐structured, group‐structured, and unstructured contests. Illustrations taken from certain recent referendums support the argument that it is useful to consider the extent to which these ideal types are in evidence ‐ alone or in combination ‐ when explaining referendum voting behaviour.