Premium
Good Cuts, Bad Cuts: The Need for Expenditure Analysis in Decremental Budgeting *
Author(s) -
Tarschys Daniel
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
scandinavian political studies
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.65
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-9477
pISSN - 0080-6757
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1984.tb00305.x
Subject(s) - austerity , public spending , government (linguistics) , commodity , public expenditure , economics , public economics , quality (philosophy) , macro , business , macroeconomics , finance , political science , public finance , politics , philosophy , linguistics , epistemology , computer science , law , programming language
Quantitative targets are widely used in decremental budgeting. On the macro‐level, governments set global limits for the growth of public expenditures, government deficits, or the ratio of government spending to GNP. On the micro‐level, reduction targets are frequently assigned to spending ministries or agencies on a selective basis or across‐the‐board. While this kind of targetry appears to be indispensable to achieve cutbacks, it is also very deficient in that it treats public expenditures as a fungible commodity, consisting of interchangeable units of account. As austerity policies are coming of age, the inherent weaknesses in the targets approach attract increasing attention, and there is growing concern about the quality of austerity measures. To make sound decisions on such measures, governments must develop a better understanding of the characteristics and properties of various public expenditures. This paper outlines four varieties of expenditure analysis that may contribute to ‘the leap from quantity to quality’ in decremental budgeting.