Premium
Aided speech‐identification performance in single‐talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing
Author(s) -
HUMES LARRY E.,
COUGHLIN MAUREEN
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.743
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1467-9450
pISSN - 0036-5564
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00740.x
Subject(s) - psychology , audiology , young adult , set (abstract data type) , speech perception , developmental psychology , perception , medicine , neuroscience , computer science , programming language
This study examined the effects of increased processing load on the closed‐set speech‐identification performance of young and older adults in a one‐talker background. Since the older adults had impaired hearing, speech‐identification performance was measured for spectrally shaped stimuli comparable to those experienced when wearing well‐fit hearing aids. There were three groups of listeners: (1) 19 older adults with high‐frequency sensorineural hearing loss; (2) 10 young adults with normal hearing who were assessed with the same spectrally shaped stimuli as the older adults; (3) 9 young adults with normal hearing who were assessed without spectral shaping and at a poorer target‐to‐competition ratio in an effort to equate overall performance to that of the older adults. In addition to this group factor, there were three within‐participant repeated‐measures independent variables designed to increase the demands on processing for the target and competing speech stimuli. These were: (1) competition meaningfulness (played in forward or reverse direction); (2) gender match between target and competing talkers (same or different gender); and (3) talker uncertainty (either the same target/competition talker pair or one of many such pairs on each trial). These three repeated‐measures independent variables were examined in a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. They showed roughly independent and additive effects on speech‐identification such that combinations of these variables decreased performance cumulatively. Older adults performed worse than young adults across the board, but also showed diminished relative improvement as the processing load was decreased. Individual differences in performance among the older adults were also examined.