z-logo
Premium
Neoclassical versus Frontier Production Models? Testing for the Skewness of Regression Residuals *
Author(s) -
Kuosmanen Timo,
Fosgerau Mogens
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
scandinavian journal of economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.725
H-Index - 64
eISSN - 1467-9442
pISSN - 0347-0520
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01567.x
Subject(s) - skewness , inefficiency , econometrics , term (time) , economics , regression , production (economics) , frontier , regression analysis , mathematics , statistics , microeconomics , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , history
The empirical literature on production and cost functions is divided into two strands. The neoclassical approach concentrates on model parameters, while the frontier approach decomposes the disturbance term to a symmetric noise term and a positively skewed inefficiency term. We propose a theoretical justification for the skewness of the inefficiency term, arguing that this skewness is the key testable hypothesis of the frontier approach. We propose to test the regression residuals for skewness in order to distinguish the two competing approaches. Our test builds directly upon the asymmetry of regression residuals and does not require any prior distributional assumptions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here