z-logo
Premium
Do Income Support Programs Impact Producer Hedging Decisions? Evidence from a Cross‐Country Comparative
Author(s) -
Woolverton Andrea E.,
Sykuta Michael E.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
applied economic perspectives and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.4
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 2040-5804
pISSN - 2040-5790
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01469.x
Subject(s) - cross country , economics , business , public economics , economic impact analysis , developing country , economic growth , demographic economics , microeconomics
This article provides a unique perspective to why U.S. producers' hedging practices are not consistent with the price‐risk management literature. We conduct a formal test of income support program impacts with survey data from South Africa and the United States, which have different producer income support policies. We find that producing in a supported environment (U.S.) decreases hedging for preplanting and preharvest expected yields by 30.39% and 20.03%, respectively. This study raises issues for further inquiry regarding both comparative agricultural lending practices and the relative costs of price‐risk management tools.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here