z-logo
Premium
Is There a Logic of Norms? *
Author(s) -
WRIGHT GEORG HENRIK VON
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
ratio juris
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.344
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1467-9337
pISSN - 0952-1917
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9337.1991.tb00099.x
Subject(s) - deontic logic , negation , seriousness , epistemology , contradiction , rationality , norm (philosophy) , logical consequence , philosophy , conjunction (astronomy) , linguistics , physics , astronomy
. If norms are neither true nor false, can logical relations such as contradiction and entailment obtain between them? Earlier logical positivists and also Hans Kelsen in his later years have answered the question with No. While appreciating the seriousness of the problem, the author of the present paper makes a fresh attempt to answer the question with Yes. His answer presupposes that norms can be judged from the point of view of their rationality . The deontic loic or logic of norms built on this foundation is much more restricted, however, than tae “classical” systems. This again is a consequence of the author's opinion that the sentential connectives (negation, conjunction, disjunction, etc.) apply to norms only on condition that they can be “shifted” from joining norm‐formulations to the descriptive contents of the norms themselves.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here