Premium
An analysis of decision processes
Author(s) -
Loasby Brian J.
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
randd management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.253
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1467-9310
pISSN - 0033-6807
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1974.tb01070.x
Subject(s) - dimension (graph theory) , process (computing) , management science , decision process , perception , quality (philosophy) , computer science , operations research , psychology , risk analysis (engineering) , process management , epistemology , business , engineering , mathematics , philosophy , neuroscience , pure mathematics , operating system
This paper outlines three ways of looking at decision processes, and relates them to problems of research management. A classification of decisions is suggested, based on three dimensions of complexity. On each dimension, innovative decisions are normally more complex than operating decisions, but since the latter are more common, there is a danger that the former will be inadequately treated, as shown in an example. These dangers may be mitigated, first, by regarding complex decision‐making as an explicitly cyclical process, and, second, by recognizing the significance of reference standards. Four types of reference standard—historical, external, planning, and imaginative—are noted, and brief consideration is given to their origins and to their influence on the perception not only of problems but also of solutions. It is argued that the range and quality of the reference standards used are likely to be significant factors in the success of research management.