Premium
GOVERNMENT LEGITIMACY AND THE LABOUR MARKET: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYMENT EXCHANGES
Author(s) -
KING DESMOND,
ROTHSTEIN BO
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.313
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1467-9299
pISSN - 0033-3298
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1994.tb01014.x
Subject(s) - legitimacy , government (linguistics) , unemployment , intervention (counseling) , market regulation , public policy , affect (linguistics) , labour economics , economic interventionism , state (computer science) , economics , business , market economy , political science , economic growth , sociology , law , politics , psychology , philosophy , linguistics , communication , algorithm , psychiatry , computer science
This article addresses the recent claim that cross‐national policy variations reflect in part differences in institutional origins and state characteristics. It provides a detailed analysis of how states institutionalized public employment exchanges. The authors argue that public employment exchanges will shape the legitimacy of government intervention in the labour market, and thus affect the environment for subsequent labour market policy. Two measures of legitimacy are used. First, the attitude of employers and trades unionists toward exchanges. Second, the role of exchanges in administering unemployment benefits. Cross‐national differences in exchanges’ legitimacy contribute to an explanation of why different states have different labour market policies.