Premium
DEVON COUNTY COUNCIL: A CASE STUDY OF A HUNG COUNCIL
Author(s) -
TEMPLE MICHAEL
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.313
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1467-9299
pISSN - 0033-3298
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1993.tb00989.x
Subject(s) - demise , compromise , alliance , negotiation , politics , closeness , public administration , government (linguistics) , political science , order (exchange) , power (physics) , political economy , sociology , law , economics , finance , mathematical analysis , linguistics , philosophy , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics
Discussions on coalition politics have tended to see the phenomenon as a feature of European national systems offering a contrast to the British tradition of (largely) single‐party government. However, the 1980s saw the rise of English local governments where highly politicized party groups were forced to compromise their political programmes in order to attain a share of power; between 1985–89, half of the English county councils were hung. This situation has particular significance in Devon, where four distinct political groups were negotiating for control. This study analyses the process of administrative formation, maintenance and breakdown in Devon, using the insights of the actors involved. While icy closeness is a crucial factor in the formation of administrations, the initial distribution of office portfolios plays a critical role in the later demise of the co‐operation between the Alliance and Labour. The study also highlights the importance of considerations such as past history, personal relations, institutional structures, and even geography to the formation and maintenance of political agreements. Devon's experience of hungness is interpreted using a ‘multi‐method’ approach, with reference to both studies of hung councils and developments in coalition theory.