z-logo
Premium
Debating the ‘Stalemate’: A Response to Dr Dixon
Author(s) -
BEW JOHN,
FRAMPTON MARTYN
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the political quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-923X
pISSN - 0032-3179
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2012.02309.x
Subject(s) - stalemate , work (physics) , politics , law and economics , positive economics , epistemology , political science , sociology , law , economics , philosophy , engineering , mechanical engineering
This article responds to the critique of our work offered by Paul Dixon in this issue of Political Quarterly . We correct the numerous inaccuracies and straightforward errors in his work, which, in our view, distort and misrepresent our arguments.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here