Premium
The Winter of Discontent in British Politics
Author(s) -
BLACK LAWRENCE,
PEMBERTON HUGH
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the political quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-923X
pISSN - 0032-3179
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2009.02055.x
Subject(s) - politics , battle , argument (complex analysis) , government (linguistics) , hay , political science , democracy , narrative , settlement (finance) , political economy , economic history , law , sociology , history , economics , ancient history , literature , art , biochemistry , chemistry , linguistics , philosophy , agronomy , finance , biology , payment
Hay's argument that the ‘winter of discontent’ was essentially a manufactured crisis was discussed at the British Academy on the thirtieth anniversary of the 22 January 1979 public sector ‘day of action’. In the edited transcript of that discussion which we publish here, three contemporary actors offer some support for, but also clear rejoinders to Hay. David Lea applauds the credit Hay gives to the efforts of the unions to make pay policy work in the late‐1970s. David Lipsey argues Hay is wrong, it was a real crisis (albeit part of a battle between two very crude political narratives) and one in which the unions essentially betrayed the Labour government's attempts to sustain social democracy. Kenneth Baker also thinks the crisis was real, but he sees it as the inevitable end of Britain's postwar settlement. A number of other distinguished commentators also offer their perspective.