Premium
The Extra‐Parliamentary Tory Party: McKenzie Revisited
Author(s) -
KELLY RICHARD
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
the political quarterly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.373
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1467-923X
pISSN - 0032-3179
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-923x.2004.00642.x
Subject(s) - victory , contest , power (physics) , politics , political science , general election , liberal party , law , economic history , political economy , sociology , history , physics , quantum mechanics
This chapter almost coincides with the fiftieth anniversary of Robert McKenzie's British Political Parties , a study which contested that power in the Tory party was centralised in its Parliamentary leadership, with its constituency members having only a marginal influence. The chapter revisits McKenzie's analysis in the light of developments since 2001, particularly the victory of Iain Duncan Smith in that year's 'democratised' Conservative leadership contest. The chapter argues that Duncan Smith's victory strengthened McKenzie's claim that democratised parties are seldom popular, and describes how IDS, ironically, spawned reforms that diminished his extra‐Parliamentary supporters. But the chapter is also an updated reminder that McKenzie underrated grass root power in certain areas ‐ notably candidate selection ‐ and suggests a lesson from the Tories' short‐lived revival under Michael Howard, namely that long‐term party recovery requires an energised party membership as well as a competent party leader.