Premium
Community‐Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation
Author(s) -
Bullinger Angelika C.,
Neyer AnneKatrin,
Rass Matthias,
Moeslein Kathrin M.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
creativity and innovation management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.148
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1467-8691
pISSN - 0963-1690
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00565.x
Subject(s) - contest , boundary spanning , competition (biology) , perspective (graphical) , set (abstract data type) , marketing , business , field (mathematics) , boundary (topology) , knowledge management , industrial organization , political science , computer science , mathematics , ecology , mathematical analysis , artificial intelligence , pure mathematics , law , biology , programming language
While the principle of competition has long been found to be conducive to innovation, community‐based innovation contests additionally offer the possibilities of interaction and cooperation among participants. This duality makes innovation contests an interesting field for both academia and practice. However, a surge in practical implementations stands in contrast to a still restricted body of academic knowledge in the field. To close this gap, drawing on a boundary spanning perspective, we examine if and how cooperation in the competitive setting of innovation contests leads to innovativeness. Cooperative orientation of contest participants is explored within a community‐based innovation contest run in 2009 at one of the largest universities in Germany. We analyse a complete set of data collected during the contest, data from a follow‐up survey among individual participants ( n = 943), as well as video and audio footage from four focus groups. Findings suggest that a very high as well as a very low degree of cooperative orientation result in a high degree of innovativeness, while a medium degree of cooperative orientation results in a low degree of innovativeness. Additionally, this research extends the concept of boundary spanning by identifying two subtypes: proactive and reactive boundary spanning .