Premium
Convergence or National Specificity? Testing the CI Maturity Model across Multiple Countries
Author(s) -
Dabhilkar Mandar,
Bengtsson Lars,
Bessant John
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
creativity and innovation management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.148
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1467-8691
pISSN - 0963-1690
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00449.x
Subject(s) - maturity (psychological) , convergence (economics) , argument (complex analysis) , variation (astronomy) , production (economics) , econometrics , computer science , economics , psychology , economic growth , microeconomics , medicine , physics , astrophysics , developmental psychology
This study empirically tests the Continuous Improvement (CI) maturity model across multiple countries. The analysis is based on data from the 2nd International CINet Survey, limited to the situation in Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Despite some differences in Continuous Improvement maturity level between countries, findings lend support to the convergence argument. Regardless of national specificity, Continuous Improvement behaviour patterns emerge in a similar fashion, and furthermore, correspond to improved operational performance if adopted. In addition, findings show that other contextual variables such as company size and type of production system are of limited importance. This implies that Continuous Improvement is something that can be implemented and developed successfully if managed properly, irrespective of contextual influences such as those stemming from cultural and industrial factors.