Premium
A Survey on Shape Correspondence
Author(s) -
van Kaick Oliver,
Zhang Hao,
Hamarneh Ghassan,
CohenOr Daniel
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
computer graphics forum
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.578
H-Index - 120
eISSN - 1467-8659
pISSN - 0167-7055
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01884.x
Subject(s) - correspondence problem , computer science , representation (politics) , shape analysis (program analysis) , point (geometry) , polygon mesh , correspondence analysis , pipeline (software) , space (punctuation) , artificial intelligence , algorithm , mathematics , machine learning , geometry , computer graphics (images) , static analysis , politics , political science , law , programming language , operating system
We review methods designed to compute correspondences between geometric shapes represented by triangle meshes, contours or point sets. This survey is motivated in part by recent developments in space–time registration, where one seeks a correspondence between non‐rigid and time‐varying surfaces, and semantic shape analysis, which underlines a recent trend to incorporate shape understanding into the analysis pipeline. Establishing a meaningful correspondence between shapes is often difficult because it generally requires an understanding of the structure of the shapes at both the local and global levels, and sometimes the functionality of the shape parts as well. Despite its inherent complexity, shape correspondence is a recurrent problem and an essential component of numerous geometry processing applications. In this survey, we discuss the different forms of the correspondence problem and review the main solution methods, aided by several classification criteria arising from the problem definition. The main categories of classification are defined in terms of the input and output representation, objective function and solution approach. We conclude the survey by discussing open problems and future perspectives.