z-logo
Premium
In Defense of Change Processes
Author(s) -
Adolph Karen E.,
Robinson Scott R
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
child development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.103
H-Index - 257
eISSN - 1467-8624
pISSN - 0009-3920
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01215.x
Subject(s) - psychology , perspective (graphical) , process (computing) , developmental psychology , cognitive science , developmental science , cognitive psychology , focus (optics) , epistemology , philosophy , physics , artificial intelligence , computer science , optics , operating system
Nativist and constructivist approaches to the study of development share a common emphasis on characterizing beginning and end states in development. This focus has highlighted the question of preservation and transformation—whether core aspects of the adult end state are present in the earliest manifestations during infancy. In contrast, a developmental systems approach emphasizes the process of developmental change. This perspective eschews the notions of objective starting and ending points in a developmental progression and rejects the idea that any particular factor should enjoy a privileged status in explaining developmental change. Using examples from motor development and animal behavior, we show how a developmental systems framework can avoid the pitfalls of the long and contentious debate about continuity versus qualitative change.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here