Premium
A DISEQUILIBRIUM MODEL UNDER BILATERAL MONOPOLY *
Author(s) -
Leslie Derek
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
bulletin of economic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.227
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1467-8586
pISSN - 0307-3378
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8586.1990.tb00668.x
Subject(s) - disequilibrium , economics , unemployment , monopoly , wage , wage bargaining , inflation (cosmology) , bargaining problem , marginal product , labour economics , product market , bargaining power , collective bargaining , efficiency wage , keynesian economics , microeconomics , macroeconomics , production (economics) , medicine , physics , incentive , theoretical physics , ophthalmology
The paper points out a crucial difference between the conventional disequilibrium macro model and partial equilibrium models of wage bargaining, In the former the real wage is constrained to be less than or equal to the marginal product, whereas in the latter the real wage is frequently constrained to be greater than or equal to the marginal product. The paper builds a disequilibrium model under bilateral monopoly, paying explicit attention to the labour market. The well‐known union model of McDonald and Solow forms the basis of the labour market analysis. Just as the three regions of Keynesian Unemployment, Classical Unemployment and Repressed Inflation are configured in the conventional case, an equivalent exercise is undertaken but with the addition of a collectively negotiated wage. The particular wage agreement used is the Nash bargain. The framework is then used to account for the unusual events that occurred in the UK labour market 1979–81, particularly the unprecedented rise in unemployment with no diminution of the inflation rate. It suggests that there was a shift in bargaining advantage in favour of employers, which resulted in an increased share of profits in national income. This regime change exacerbated the unfavourable circumstances for labour, which existed at that time.