Premium
Longitudinal Tracer Studies: Research Methodology of the Middle Range
Author(s) -
Chau Vinh Sum,
Witcher Barry J.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
british journal of management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.407
H-Index - 108
eISSN - 1467-8551
pISSN - 1045-3172
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00459.x
Subject(s) - relevance (law) , tracer , reflexivity , context (archaeology) , range (aeronautics) , software deployment , computer science , sociology , epistemology , psychology , social science , political science , history , philosophy , physics , archaeology , nuclear physics , law , operating system , materials science , composite material
This article reviews the longitudinal tracer study in the context of the researcher–practitioner relevance gap. It proposes the tracer as a methodological middle‐range approach that takes account of relevancy and which involves practitioners in the research process. An ESRC research project about hoshin kanri (policy deployment) is used as an example to explain the longitudinal tracer study approach. The methodological approach is consistent with middle range theory and thinking, and involves skeletal prior theory, tags, a practitioner network, and continuous reflexivity. It is concluded that the longitudinal tracer study can be a useful middle‐range solution to help close the researcher–practitioner gap.