Premium
DESIGNING BABIES: MORALLY PERMISSIBLE WAYS TO MODIFY THE HUMAN GENOME 1
Author(s) -
AGAR NICHOLAS
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
bioethics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1467-8519
pISSN - 0269-9702
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00297.x
Subject(s) - eugenics , argument (complex analysis) , intervention (counseling) , appeal , bioethics , value of life , psychology , law , epistemology , sociology , law and economics , environmental ethics , political science , philosophy , medicine , economics , psychiatry , microeconomics
My focus in this paper is the question of the moral acceptability of attempts to modify the human genome. Much of the debate in this area has revolved around the distinction between supposedly therapeutic modification on the one hand, and eugenic modification on the other. In the first part of the paper I reject some recent arguments against genetic engineering. In the second part I seek to distinguish between permissible and impermissible forms of intervention in such a way that does not appeal to the therapeutic/eugenic distinction. If I am right much of what we would intuitively call eugenic intervention will be morally acceptable. Central to my argument is an asymmetry in the way genetic engineers can influence a person's capacities on the one hand and life‐goals on the other. Forms of genetic intervention that have a high probability of producing a mismatch of life‐goals and capacities will be ruled out.