Premium
Defining Executive Power: Constitutional Reform for Grown‐ups
Author(s) -
Sharman Campbell
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1997.tb01550.x
Subject(s) - commonwealth , government (linguistics) , politics , power (physics) , scope (computer science) , separation of powers , capital (architecture) , political science , law and economics , executive power , political capital , public administration , law , economics , history , philosophy , linguistics , physics , archaeology , quantum mechanics , computer science , programming language
Australia is well endowed with constitutions. It has seven, one for the commonwealth and each of the six states, and nine if the documents establishing self‐government for the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory are included. This gives plenty of scope for constitutional reform: that is, changing the most important rules which specify how a political community is governed. In the event, public debate over constitutional reform in Australia has been sporadic and concentrated on a narrow range of issues. Perhaps this is as it should be. Constitutions should reflect broad public acceptance of the basic rules governing the operation of government, and if the system is running smoothly, there is little reason for change. Only when events occur that demonstrate that there are shortcomings in the structure of government should constitutional reform be considered.