Premium
ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING VALUATIONS AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNMENT: A POTENTIALLY PERNICIOUS UNION
Author(s) -
Aiken M.,
Capitanio C.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1995.tb01169.x
Subject(s) - allocative efficiency , accrual , accountability , accounting , economics , subjectivity , decentralization , public economics , private sector , control (management) , government (linguistics) , business , finance , market economy , political science , earnings , microeconomics , law , economic growth , management , philosophy , epistemology , linguistics
With the movement towards decentralisation of control over governmental trading activities much attention has been placed by politicians and economists on a loosely attached rate of return control philosophy. Independent boards are appointed to government business entities, generally comprising business managers and private sector directors who are experienced in profit generation and micro‐ economic planning. This thrust has now been facilitated by accounting standards with a private sector orientation. These favour accrual valuations with their associated resource allocations and guidelines for funds distribution. However, the extent of the subjectivity introduced by such measures has now placed many parliamentary conventions at risk. Such subjectivity also contributes to the lack of goal congruence and financial control in government which in turn can counteract macroeconomic planning and control as this is at present practised and understood. This paper examines normatively some of the theoretical defects and conventional heresies associated with these new allocative and distributional arrangements.