Premium
SCIENCE, RISK AND HEALTH POLICY: THE CHANGING OPERATIONAL RELATIONSHIP
Author(s) -
Peachment Allan
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1991.tb02298.x
Subject(s) - dilemma , government (linguistics) , dominance (genetics) , variety (cybernetics) , medical research , political science , public relations , politics , uncertainty , medicine , law , computer science , epistemology , philosophy , linguistics , biochemistry , chemistry , statistics , mathematics , pathology , artificial intelligence , gene
Scientific research is usually regarded as an impartial contributor to the public policy‐making process. However, increasingly, such research in health matters to do with industrial processes, medical intervention and drug therapy is perceived to pose risks and thus produce uncertainty in government and anxiety among consumers of health services. This when the scientific research agenda is about to take increasingly dramatic steps with important implications for applied science. Five select issues intended to depict a lack of research consensus and resulting in perceptions of societal risk‐taking are used to illustrate this phenomenon. The growing influence of the “Green” environmental and consumer movement promises increasing resistance to science‐based societal risk‐taking. Scientists have acknowledged problems and advocate a variety of responses including the adoption of radically different aims and methods in science. The quality of some medical statistics and the dominance of the research methods agenda by epidemiologists is also a cause for concern. The major dilemma, however, is that while both refutation and uncertainty are integral to the Popperian model of puzzle‐solving in science, they are factors which pose serious political risks in decision‐making for ministers and their advisers.