Premium
ENERGY FLOW IN AUSTRALIA: MATCHING NEEDS AND SUPPLIES *
Author(s) -
Gifford Roger M.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
australian journal of public administration
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.524
H-Index - 41
eISSN - 1467-8500
pISSN - 0313-6647
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1978.tb00416.x
Subject(s) - consumption (sociology) , energy policy , bureaucracy , flexibility (engineering) , environmental economics , renewable energy , energy consumption , economics , government (linguistics) , business , economic system , political science , engineering , sociology , politics , social science , linguistics , philosophy , management , law , electrical engineering
Energy flow and transformation, being a fundamental driving force behind organization, should be subject to long term government policy. A pre‐requisite for formulating energy policy is detailed knowledge of the dynamics and thermodynamics of energy supply and utilization. The lack of coherent policy in the past has led to the development of a society which is physically, institutionally and psychologically locked into an unsustainable liquid fuel consumption pattern requiring not only high but also growing consumption. An expression of this situation is the widespread assumption that coal and nuclear energy are the only significant realistic longer term options for the future, even though these would involve unproven technology and considerable environmental and social risks. The other long term option—the diffuse energy option based on widely distributed, renewable energy sources such as wind and the sun—is generally regarded as unrealistic. This is a social judgement determined more by the inertia of existing institutions and perceptions of our needs than by technical reality. It is possible however, that the measures which might be taken to deal with the crisis of oil depletion in the next couple of decades may swing community structure and attitude and bureaucratic organization into a conservation‐minded pattern in which the long term option based on low, stable consumption, diffuse energy sources and decentralized conversion systems seems as realistic to policy makers as the other extreme—the centralized, nuclear‐electric, growth society. This flexibility could only emerge, however, if energy research expenditure is diversified very soon.