Premium
Prestige, Prudence and Public Opinion in the 1882 British Occupation of Egypt
Author(s) -
Halvorson Dan
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
australian journal of politics and history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.123
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1467-8497
pISSN - 0004-9522
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8497.2010.01563.x
Subject(s) - prestige , suez canal , prudence , interpretation (philosophy) , politics , intervention (counseling) , political science , order (exchange) , character (mathematics) , law , economic history , history , economics , philosophy , international trade , psychology , linguistics , theology , finance , psychiatry , geometry , mathematics
This article challenges both the “gentlemanly capitalist” thesis and “official mind” interpretation of the 1882 British occupation of Egypt. The former fails to adequately consider the political character of the Anglo‐French financial Control overturned by the Urabist revolt in February 1882. The latter overstates the significance of the Suez Canal as both trigger and justification for military intervention. The article argues that the primary motivation behind the Egyptian occupation was the vindication of British prestige, vis‐à‐vis the Continental Powers, but especially in India and in the “East” by suppressing the threat to “civilised” order posed by the Urabist revolt. The protection of the Suez Canal and British financial and trade interests were secondary and derivative.