Premium
Measuring the risk attitude of decision‐makers: are there differences between groups of methods and persons?
Author(s) -
MaartNoelck Syster C.,
Musshoff Oliver
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.683
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1467-8489
pISSN - 1364-985X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00620.x
Subject(s) - lottery , incentive , reliability (semiconductor) , psychology , actuarial science , social psychology , economics , microeconomics , power (physics) , physics , quantum mechanics
Many studies quantifying individual risk preferences of test persons show that results of different measuring methods may vary. Additional reservations about the reliability of the results regarding the risk attitude measurement arise from the fact that most studies are based on convenience groups, such as students or businessmen in developing countries. With this in mind, we systematically compare different measuring methods to answer the question how the choice of method affects the results. Moreover, we compare the risk preferences of G erman farmers with those of students and K azakhstani farmers to investigate whether farmers’ risk preferences can be approximated through those of convenience groups. The methods applied comprise an incentive‐compatible H olt‐and‐ L aury‐lottery as well as two psychometric methods. Results show that students respond consistently across all three elicitation methods whereas G erman and K azakhstani farmers are more inconsistent. Significant differences exist in the responses of G erman students and G erman farmers. The comparison of risk preferences between G erman and K azakhstani farmers, however, reveals significant similarities with respect to the psychometric methods.