Premium
Vacancies and Unemployment in Australia
Author(s) -
Chindamo Phillip,
Uren Lawrence
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
australian economic review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.308
H-Index - 29
eISSN - 1467-8462
pISSN - 0004-9018
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-8462.2010.00589.x
Subject(s) - business cycle , economics , volatility (finance) , unemployment , wage , productivity , unemployment rate , flexibility (engineering) , monetary economics , econometrics , macroeconomics , labour economics , management
This article examines the extent to which the Mortensen–Pissarides model of labour market search can quantitatively match business cycle fluctuations in Australia. With productivity and job‐separation‐rate shocks, the model fails to produce substantial volatility among unemployment or vacancies, a result similar to Shimer's (2005) findings for the United States. Examining a broader range of shocks significantly increases the magnitude of business cycle fluctuations, but still only explains roughly 25 per cent of labour market volatility. The implied volatility of wages in the model is similar to that in the data and hence excessive wage flexibility is unlikely to be central to the failure of the model as claimed in the literature.