Impact in general practice of the policies of the organised approach to preventing cancer of the cervix

This cross‐sectional survey of cancer screening in May 1996 used a national random sample of a specified group of general practitioners (GPs).The survey included items to assess the impact of the Organised Approach to the Prevention of Cervical Cancer (OAPCC). Of the 1,271 GPs who satisfied the eligibility criteria, 855 (67%) returned a completed questionnaire. Fifty‐two per cent indicated they would be ‘highly’ likely to introduce a discussion about cervical smears to a 58–year‐old woman who was in good health and had come for a non‐gynaecological consultation. Female sex, RACGP affiliation, practising in a metropolitan area and awareness of the OAPCC booklet were independent predictors of an opportunistic orientation. By contrast, 91 % indicated that they would be ‘highly’ likely to include a Pap smear in a general health checkup. Thirty‐eight per cent reported that they had found the booklet about the 1991 screening policy ‘very’ useful, while 38% found the NHMRC guidelines for the management of women with screen detected abnormalities ‘very’ useful. Around one‐fifth of the GPs were not aware of these documents. Overall, 19% still recommended annual or more frequent screening. GPs from NSW and Queensland were less likely to support biennial screening than GPs from other states. Overall, 26% of GPs did not indicate that they would refer a woman who had tested positive for any grade of CIN for colposcopic assessment. Female GPs were more likely to refer women with CIN for colposcopic assessment while older doctors were less likely to do so.