Open AccessA community–based approach to the control of sexually transmitted diseases in the Northern Territory
Author(s) -
Bowden Francis J.,
Bastian Ivan,
Johnston Fay
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/j.1467-842x.1997.tb01745.x
Subject(s) - syphilis , medicine , chlamydia , serology , public health , urine , chlamydia trachomatis , population , genitourinary system , epidemiology , sexually transmitted disease , immunology , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , gynecology , environmental health , antibody , pathology
A program to control sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) was undertaken during a Men's Health Week in a remote Aboriginal community in Western Arnhem Land, Northern Territory. A total of 151 men aged 13 years and over who attended over a five–day period underwent a full physical examination, and first–void urine specimens were tested for the presence of leukocytes, chlamydia (by enzyme immunoassay antigen detection) and gonorrhoea (by culture and antigen detection). Blood was taken for syphilis serology from all patients and for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from patients with a proven STD or at the patient's request. Consent for testing was obtained from all participants. Patients with a positive urinary leukocyte test or symptoms were offered urethral swab investigations and treated empirically according to a set protocol. Patients with STDs detected by subsequent laboratory investigations were followed up and treated. The overall prevalence of one or more of syphilis, gonorrhoea or chlamydia was 17.4 per cent. No men presented with genitourinary symptoms and none was HIV–infected. In this population, STDs were an important cause of morbidity, and a community–based approach was adopted to identify infected persons. The use of urine for the detection of gonorrhoea and chlamydia was highly acceptable. Although not used in this study, polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction technology will facilitate similar activities in the future. ( Aust N Z J Public Health 1997; 21: 519–23)